One way for relevant evidence regarding children to be admitted is through a Child and Family Investigator (CFI) or Parental Responsibilities Evaluator (PRE). These court-appointed professionals conduct investigations, and because they are court-appointed neutrals not representing the interests of either party, they can write and testify as to statements made by children.
The CFI or PRE is considered an expert witness, and under Colorado Rule of Evidence 705, may testify as to opinions that lay witnesses can not. The CFI or PRE is also presumed to be an unbiased witness, which adds credibility to their testimony. The expert may be required to disclose the facts underlying their opinion on cross-examination. Experts can testify as to inadmissible facts and data, including hearsay, if that evidence formed the basis of their opinion and is a type reasonably relied on by others in the field.
HearsayThere are a few other ways that evidence of a child's statements can come into evidence, despite that, without an evidentiary exception, they are considered inadmissible "hearsay" - an out of court statement offered for the truth of the matter asserted. There are five hearsay exceptions that may make a child's statement an admissible exception.
Statements of a child victim about sexual or physical abuse are a hearsay exception if (1) the time, content and circumstances of the statement provide sufficient safeguards of reliability and (2) The child either testifies or is unavailable as a witness and there is corroborative evidence of the act which is the subject of the statement.
Child Testimony In CameraA court may interview a child in chambers and permit counsel to be present at the interview. A record of the interview must be made and become part of the case record unless the Court does not ask the child about their wishes as to allocation of parental responsibilities. The Court has discretion in deciding whether to hear directly from a child or not. Because discussing a matter may be difficult and traumatic for a child, many courts consider the age of the child and the importance of the testimony in determining whether to hear directly from a child.
Therapist-Patient PrivilegeHow does the therapist-patient privilege impact evidence of child abuse and neglect? Sometimes therapists are in possession of relevant evidence, yet there are important protections in place to ensure the integrity of therapeutic relationships, and to encourage patients to confide in therapists without fearing that their confidences will be made public.
A patient must consent to the testimony of his or her therapist in court, but a child can not waive the privilege, because he or she is not considered competent to do so due to age. A parent also can not waive the privilege when the parent is a party to an action and may have a self-serving motive in the testimony.
If you have questions about parenting time restrictions and evidence, contact Janko Family Law Solutions for a free case assessment to determine what your legal options are and how we might assist in resolving your legal issue so that you can put it behind you. We can be contacted at 719-344-5523.